BizCar - English Language Books: International supplier of books in the English language
|
|
|
| Teach Yourself Sanskrit Complete Course (Teach Yourself) | 
enlarge | Authors: Michael Coulson, Gombrich Richard, James Benson Publisher: McGraw-Hill Category: Book
List Price: $24.95 (58.73 RON) Buy New: $16.47 (38.77 RON) You Save: $8.48 (19.96 RON) (34%)
Avg. Customer Rating: 28 reviews Sales Rank: 211518
Media: Paperback Edition: 2 Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 400 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5.1 x 1.2
ISBN: 0071468528 Dewey Decimal Number: 491 EAN: 9780071468527 ASIN: 0071468528
Publication Date: April 14, 2006 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Promotion: Save $10.00 when you spend $50.00 or more on Qualifying Items offered by Amazon.com. Enter code BMLSAVES at checkout. Terms and Conditions Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Customer Reviews:
Not a good teaching book July 23, 2003 11 out of 12 found this review helpful
I bought this book when I was just beginning to learn Sanskrit because it was the cheapest thing on the market, and because I read that it had linguistic sidenotes in it (which, being something of a linguistics geek, appealed to me). While the book certainly makes interesting reading, and would probably be useful as a reference grammar for more advanced students, I found that this book was extremely unhelpful in trying to learn the language. Most glaringly, there are only 15 chapters. This means that each chapter covers a huge amount of grammar. While it is not too much for a person to learn, there are not nearly enough excercises for one to practice sufficiently. The size of the vocabulary is more manageable, but this simply means that one doesn't get a very extensive vocabulary, and vocabulary is *very* important. Additionally, the author soon abandons teaching things to us. Instead of teaching the cases beyond the nominative and accusative, readers are encouraged to simply use the reference grammar. Yes, one can always go to the back of the book and learn it themselves, but the chapter excercises are not geared towards this, and do not reinforce the information. Overall, I was left with the feeling that, while I would be able to learn Sanskrit from this back, I might as well just get a reference grammar. I am now using Egene's book and find it extremely helpful. I recommend this instead.
Not the best Sanskrit Primer March 19, 2002 24 out of 24 found this review helpful
Coulson's text is a nightmare to use if you don't already know some Sanskrit. I highly suggest starting off with Thomas Egenes "Introduction to Sanskrit, Part I." Egenes text consists of 18 concise but simple lessons which provide one with a foundation in basic Sanskrit for building upon with more a thorough text. (In fact, Egenes states that his text is a "pre-primer;" I have to say, it is a most excellent one.) Coulson's text becomes much easier to comprehend. I also recommend taking a look at Devavanipravesika, the text used by Berkeley for its Sanskrit course. It is very thorough and not as difficult as Coulson's.
For professors not for learners March 3, 2002 13 out of 15 found this review helpful
I can certainly recommend this book to all university professors teaching Sanskrit and to all those individuals who know everything about Sanskrit, and now want to see what the respectable author has to say and know about Sanskrit.But if you do not know Sanskrit and want to learn it, do not spend your money and do not waste your time on this book. I love `Teach yourself ...' series, I used some of their books and this book was my first disappointment in that series. On three occasions I started my study but I could not go past the first chapter. The author assumes not only that you know Greek and Latin but also that you know Sanskrit and then passing lightly over important grammatical points and rules, spends most of his and yours time to give you some subtle hints about some exotic uses of Sanskrit grammar. So avoid this `Look what I know about Sanskrit, you will never be as clever as I am' book and try something else.
This book is great if you have a Phd in linguistics! January 27, 2002 5 out of 8 found this review helpful
This book is probably a great book if you a have a firm backround in lingustics, but it is hardly a "beginers book". Its introduction to the script is also very confusing. I am going to exchange this book for Thomas Egenes book, everyone seems to say that it is much more suited for the beginer.
A perverse production best avoided by beginners. September 4, 2001 46 out of 50 found this review helpful
Although Coulson's 'Teach Yourself Sanskrit' is, in many ways, an excellent and extremely thorough textbook, it is hardly suited to the average beginner. Most of us are drawn to Sanskrit because of a prior interest in The Bhagavad Gita, The Upanishads, The Mahabharata, The Ramayana, even The Hitopadesa. Coulson, however, has chosen - perversely it seems to me - to draw all of his examples from Sanskrit drama, a branch of Sanskrit literature which is of minimal interest to most readers. Even worse, he seems to have designed the book primarily for exceptionally gifted students, and for those who are already competent in an ancient inflected language such as Latin or Greek. His procedure, in other words, betrays an elitist attitude that has resulted in a book which, rather than teaching anyone Sanskrit, is far more likely to put them off for life. I gave up in despair about halfway through the book, and so have many others.This is a pity, as Sanskrit is an exceptionally beautiful language, but there is a remedy at hand. Instead of wasting one's time with Coulson, the beginner would be far better off acquiring a copy of Thomas Egenes 'Introduction to Sanskrit' (2 volumes). Almost all introductory treatments of Sanskrit have been produced for linguists, but here finally is a truly practical and useful primer of Sanskrit for ordinary folks and human beings. After working one's way through it (and finding out why India really loves its sacred literature, epics, and wisdom stories), Coulson might be tackled with profit ... but not before.
|
|
|