BizCar - English Language Books: International supplier of books in the English language
|
|
|
| New World Order | 
 enlarge | Author: A. Ralph Epperson
Publisher: Publius Press
Category: Book
List Price: $16.95 (39.90 RON)
Buy New: $11.53 (27.14 RON)
You Save: $5.42 (12.76 RON) (32%)
Avg. Customer Rating:  22 reviews
Sales Rank: 60986
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 357
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1
Dimensions (in): 8.4 x 5.4 x 0.9
ISBN: 0961413514
Dewey Decimal Number: 366
EAN: 9780961413514
ASIN: 0961413514
Publication Date: January 1, 1990
Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping
Promotion: Save $10.00 when you spend $50.00 or more on Qualifying Items offered by Amazon.com. Enter code BMLSAVES at checkout. Terms and Conditions
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Customer Reviews:
| Showing reviews 1-5 of 22 | | NEXT » |
 the secrets the you want to know May 31, 2008
when I buy this Books.I buy it' just for sinple curiosity,
but after i read the Book.I say (my God I can Believe)
all the things the I dont' not.
 Missed the mark [of the beast] unfortunately November 28, 2006
4 out of 15 found this review helpful
Epperson's book NWO seems like a good idea, but the problem is when you research his quotations you will find that they are taken out of context to advance his viewpoint, however, in the scheme of things, Epperson doesn't bring facts to support his theory, which may be true to some extend. Certainly there are business people that seek only to advance their greed and power, but that blame cannot solely be put on Freemasons, if at all.
Freemasons seek light, which in Latin is translated into Lucifer (i.e. light bringer). How Epperson comes to the conclusion of Masons seeking light [knowledge] to somehow equal Satan worshippers is beyond me, but it just shows how his conclusions are wrong, and if anyone bothered to read the sources of his quotes from books like Morals and Dogma (Pike) they would reach the conclusion that Epperson is indeed wrong. However, since most will not take the time out to do their own research they will buy into this nonsensical rhetoric.
 The New World Order April 21, 2006
21 out of 37 found this review helpful
Let us begin by getting one thing straight. There is a New World Order.
Sadly the subject naturally attracts a lot of paranoiacs and conspiracy theorists who make mincemeat of the solid facts and compelling evidence that is right there before all our eyes. This book is no exception. Frankly it is almost impossible to find a single decent unpolluted source on the New World Order so I give this book four out of five.
It is worth a read. Many books on this subject are worth a read, though the proportions of raving and utter nonsense vary.
Why are the Star of David and the pyramid and the blazing eye of God on the Great Seal of the United States? Who or what is "Lucifer?" The answers are linked to the New World Order but the links are almost always taken wildly out of context by frankly quite delusional people.
The Star of David, the hexagram, is about Freemasonry and the Temple of Solomon. It does have connotations within witchcraft but that's because the covens of witch "Craft" and the Lodges of the Masonic "Craft" intermingled in the days when both had to hide their pentagrams and elabourate rituals in order to survive. The pentagram is not about satan it is about the human form as depicted by Da Vinci. It is about the universal life force and the creative principle. The pyramid arises from Freemasonry and the quasi-Freemasonry of the Illuminati, both of whom once had the mistaken belief that the Hebrews built the Pyramids (There is no historical evidence for this) and both of whom use analogies about architectural perfection in their philosophy. The blazing eye of God is also Masonic and also found its way into the Illuminism movement that infiltrated the Craft.
Lucifer is not a serpent of all-devouring evil. Wake up and flip the universe the right way around! Lucifer literally means "giver of light" as in source of knowledge. Snakes get rather bad press but Moses used one, the therapeutae used the symbol of the snake-bound staff/caduceus and you'll see this on most ambulences around the world thanks to the widespread influence of the Knights Templar who were exposed to certain ancient teachings in medieval times. Lucifer pointed out to Adam and Eve that God was lying to them: they wouldn't die of eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge - rather they would come to know themselves. ("Know Thyself" was later the sacred command given to devotees at the temple of the oracle at Delphi and in their wisdom the greatest philosophers, including Socrates and Pythagoras repeated it to those who had ears.) When Adam and Eve had self-knowledge they realised they were just naked cattle in a great big farm of delusion and ignorance.
If you really want to understand the ancient omnipresent themes of healing, medicine, life, creation and their symbols - the ankh, the red cross and the snaked caduceus - then you might start here because your journey of discovery may brush against the New World Order. But then it will take you far beyond.
The myth of Adam and Eve ends with the first ever enlightened human beings thrown out of what they thought was heaven on earth.
Ignorance is bliss ...
... isn't it? ...
on point October 15, 2005
10 out of 13 found this review helpful
everything in here is real. just his timing was off; but only by a year, really... cuz in 1991 Bush announced the New World Order. epperson called 1990 as the year. great, scary, worthwhile read
Wish it was better.. September 19, 2005
12 out of 17 found this review helpful
The writing style is fine, the research is fair to good compared to others in the field, but he does anyone who is interested in real history a great disservice in promoting this work, because of his horribly shoddy jumps in logic.
Even on points that I would agree with him on, or that have been explained and researched much better elsewhere, I can not support him on because of his almost purposeful misreadings as quotes, his constant ruling out of alternatives, and dictums that this is 'necessary' or 'obvious', when it is no such thing.
Any first year philosophy or debate student could rip him and his case to shreds, which is a shame, since some of the research is on the right track and quite good.
So, I'd skip this one.. his presentation style makes it too hard to be able to tell which points are ludicrous and which are valid.
|
|
|
