The Monk and the PhilosopherMay 8, 2008 The Monk and the Philosopher: A Father and Son Discuss the Meaning of Life The book was wonderful. It gave each persons point of view in detail to enable you to take anything you wish from the discussion.
Two enriching perspectivesNovember 3, 2007 This is a wonderful and beautiful book. Wonderful because, as the Dalai Lama writes on the cover, "it shows how fruitful open-hearted dialogue can be." And beautiful because such dialogue happens to be between father and son, two very bright minds who look at the world from quite different perspectives. From the time of the Buddha up to now there have been hundreds of monks and holy men -religious scholars- abstractly describing the ecstatic and "samadhic" experience. More recently, neurologists -science scholars- are "painting" somebody else's experience (that of monks and nuns) using imaging technology. But Mathieu Ricard Revel is one of the few who can actually speak simultaneously from both the experience and knowledge of the monk and the scientist. Reviewing this book would require many pages. However, I just one to highlight something that I considered particularly instructive (even though I disagree with the conclusion). Mathieu's metaphors of the tenth link of the dependent origination chain (from becoming to birth/rebirth), illustrating the phenomenon of "reincarnation" to his pragmatic father, are the most clarifying and explanatory I have ever read. Coming from an educated and eminent biologist, they have my deepest respect. Still, as I said, "rebirth" is the only notion of the basic Teachings of the Buddha which I do not share. (I personally consider "rebirth" a belief that does affect the extraordinary and elementary quality of the Buddha's Teachings).
Meaningful & Intellectually ProvocativeSeptember 2, 2007 The dialogue between Revel & Ricard are meaningful & intellectually provocative. Their open, critical & coherent discussion not merely enabled me to learn more about meaning of life, thru the lenses of both Western philosophy & Eastern Buddism, but also guided me to see things in a more lucid perspective. I look forward to exploring, learning, & experiencing more about the path to enlightenment introduced by Ricard.
Wonderful conversation on religion and philosophyOctober 21, 2006 This is a father son conversation on religion and philosophy. It is a wonderful and enlightening look at Buddhism and rationality. What an extraordinary opportunity to explore the juxtaposition between a father and his rational philosophical beliefs and his son having grown up a westerner in a rational family and moving to the spiritual realm of Buddhism. His western lens is very helpful to understand this body of belief.
A must read if you are interested in a conversation that leads to understanding and learning that bridges the rational and the spiritual.
FantasticJune 3, 2006 3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I really enjoyed this book at various levels. First of all, as an intellectual exchange of views between father and son, both of whom are obviously very knowledgeable in their fields of expertise. Most of the conversations between them took place in Nepal, and some in northern France. Secondly, I enjoyed it as a means to elucidate some points of Buddhist epistemology and metaphysics. Matthieu did a very good job as a spokesperson for Tibetan Buddhism. Thirdly, I enjoyed it because of what it made me aware of: views like those of Revel, an atheist and skeptical philosopher who stands in the ethical traditions of both Epicureism and Stoicism, are not enough to satisfy my spirit's quest for a comprehensive and organic view of life, since they are issued from a merely philosophical and scientist perspective. Every time Matthieu made a good point, Revel's reply would be like : "Oh, this idea too was known in the Western philosophical tradition...So and so said the same thing..." It may well be true, but all of these views are part of the Buddhist organic, comprehensive tradition, the chief aim of which is to attain liberation from the illusion of the self, or enlightenment. Clearly Revel prefers a syncretistic approach to a straight forward, comprehensive one, like the Buddhist or the Christian paths. This was obviously a conversation, not a debate, in which Matthieu would have won hands down. There are many unfavorable reference to Christianity, which makes me wonder if either one, especially Revel, has ever studied the Christian theological tradition.
